The Archives and archival staff acknowledge our complicity in institutional racism and inequity at BB&N. We recognize that archivists exercise power through choosing who and what to include or exclude from our historical records. As the school moves toward the goal of becoming an anti-racist institution, our archival staff is committed to engaging in this work. Below are several areas in which we are actively reassessing our practices and moving forward through the lens of equity and inclusion.
This work is ongoing and constantly evolving, and we welcome any questions or feedback you may have about this statement or our work. Please contact us at archives@bbns.org.(mailto:archives@bbns.org)
Flagging Harmful Language and Content
As archival collections are largely historical in nature, materials sometimes contain harmful, offensive, and outdated language or content. In order to ensure researchers’ well-being when encountering these materials, we provide content warnings on all harmful or potentially harmful collections.
For collections known to contain harmful content, staff have included a content warning to the collection’s finding aid in ArchivesSpace. This content warning provides clear information about the type of content, as well as which materials contain it.
Not all collections have been processed and checked by archival staff. For unprocessed collections that may contain harmful content, staff have included a general content advisory in the finding aid that warns of the potential to encounter harmful content.
If you encounter harmful or offensive language or content in our archival collections, on our website, or in our finding aids, please contact us at archives@bbns.org.(mailto:archives@bbns.org)
Finding Aid Descriptions
We are committed to using accurate and respectful language in our descriptions and finding aids. We also acknowledge language is always changing, and so our descriptions will be regularly assessed for the presence of harmful or outdated language. In choosing language for our descriptions, we:
• Use terms chosen by people to describe themselves,
• Choose people-first language, unless otherwise preferred by an individual or group,
• Avoid subject headings that have damaging connotations or contexts.
In some cases, harmful language might offer a certain level of research value by documenting the context of a specific collection or time. Several examples include:
• Organization names that include outdated language,
• A title of a published work,
• An individual defining themselves in terms no longer preferred by their larger community.
We will assess these instances on a case-by-case basis to determine whether including the term in the finding aid is helpful to researchers. In cases where this language might be retained in the description, we will clearly indicate such language as coming from contextual documents.
Collection Development and Access
The BB&N Archives has not prioritized collections documenting the experiences and work of the school’s BIPOC community members. As we move toward becoming an antiracist school, the archival staff is committed to identifying historically underrepresented and misrepresented groups in our collections and to prioritizing access to these materials. In order to provide equitable access, we select subject headings that accurately and respectfully describe and highlight all of our community members. We are also dedicated to pinpointing spaces of silence in our collections, and working with underrepresented groups to identify representative materials for inclusion in the archives.